There’s a temptation in times of crisis for leadership to feel the need to redeploy people. The idea is that urgent priorities are best handled by moving people around, creating tiger teams, and putting them on the urgent work.
Organisational agility is about delivering value to customers, always striving to improve time to market, quality and innovation. The performance of agile teams that produces those results are a key factor and agile research suggests that to reach that objective, we need teams which are self-organising, cross functional and long lived. But we live in a different world than we did 4 weeks ago and now teams are working remotely and business priorities and products have changed. Are long lived agile teams a luxury we can no longer afford?
Ability to respond quickly and change
Due to the high volatility and change in the COVID world, the need for team stability is being challenged for the following reasons:- new skills and capabilities may be necessary to teams to meet changing priorities
- necessity to increase capacity of the team
- people needing to be diverted to other areas of need in the business and/or change roles
- re-organisations could take place with a smaller cadence than in the past
Bring the work to the team not the people to the work
Moving people around might give the illusion that swift action is being taken, but the reality is that there is significant lead time (up to 3 months) for people who have not worked before to learn how to work effectively. To act swiftly, change the priorities of an existing team and bring the work to them.
This means mobilising teams that have already formed and worked together rather than mobilising individual people to fill gaps.
As Mike Cohn puts it…. a team who has been together for a while will always outperform new teams.
Long Lived Agile Teams
Long lived agile teams have the advantage of being stable and more predictability in delivery and productivity. It takes a long time to form and get the know who to work together and collaborate to develop as a team and work as a team. Over time stronger behavioral and working dynamics, higher levels of transparency that favor trust and collaboration among its members when facing complexity drives increased levels of performance. We know from the research that any changes to the team can potentially lead to a drop in performance and that adding or moving team members breaks stability and forces the team to review its dynamics and create new ones: this produces inefficiencies, reducing motivation.The underlying message is, rather than break teams up to put people on urgent work, identify the best team to do the urgent work, and bring the work to the team. Agile teams benefit from some consistency.